<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<atom:link href="http://reverent.org/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<title>Reverent Entertainment</title>
<link>http://reverent.org/</link>
<description>reverent updates</description>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 1 Apr 2008 06:07:00 PST</lastBuildDate>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<title>Vote for the worst painting 2008!</title>
<link>http://reverent.org/bad_painting_contest.html</link>
<guid>http://reverent.org/bad_painting_contest.html</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Apr 2008 06:07:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>The vote for the worst painting 2008 at the International Pavel Jerdanowitch Painting Contest has started.
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Let us be fair to Malevich</title>
<link>http://reverent.org/let_us_be_fair_to_malevich.html</link>
<guid>http://reverent.org/let_us_be_fair_to_malevich.html</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:40:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>Sometimes I hear the objection that my test "True art, or fake?" has a flaw. You see, to evaluate the quality one needs to see not a small image on the monitor, but a big painting in a museum.
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Quiz: Donald Judd, or Cheap Furniture?</title>
<link>http://reverent.org/donald_judd_or_cheap_furniture.html</link>
<guid>http://reverent.org/donald_judd_or_cheap_furniture.html</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>Some of the photos displayed below show exquisite furniture, created by the famous minimalist sculptor Donald Judd. These masterpieces of design are meant for furnishing apartments that also contain famous abstract paintings. The rest of the photos show ordinary cheap furniture. Can you tell which is which?
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Quiz: Poe-tical, or not?</title>
<link>http://reverent.org/poe-tical_or_not.html</link>
<guid>http://reverent.org/poe-tical_or_not.html</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Apr 2007 00:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>In 1877 an unrecognized poet James Whitcomb Riley received another letter of rejection from an editor. He decided to avenge. Riley took one of his poems and passed it as if it was a newly discovered work of Edgar Allan Poe. This poem was, of course, published and soon recognized as a masterpiece. The editors could not tell the poet, whom they had rejected, from Poe. And what about you?
</description>
</item>

<!-- put more items here -->
</channel>
</rss>
